In Re: David Nollmeyer

Nollmeyer v. Doe

 
Home
US Federal Court Appendix
Nollmeyer v. Laney
Nollmeyer v. DE State Police
Nollmeyer v. Doe
Nollmeyer V. U.S.A.G.
Nollmeyer v. Inyo Co Sheriff
Nollmeyer v. USPS
Nollmeyer v. Davis
Nollmeyer v. Pete Wilson For Gov, et al
Nollmeyer v. Holiday Market
Nollmeyer v. Lockyer, et al
Nollmeyer v. Lockeyer, et al (MC-101)
Nollmeyer v. New Raman Reti
Nollmeyer v. Reno et al (Fl)
Case Descriptions
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
Nollmeyer v. Delaware State Police, et al.
Nollmeyer Versus Doe

Nollmeyer v. Doe


Powereality Search Engine






U.S. District Court

U. S. District Court of Delaware (Wilmington)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-503

Nollmeyer v. Doe

Filed: 08/04/99
Assigned to: Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr.
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 890
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act




DAVID NOLLMEYER                   David Nollmeyer
                                    plaintiff                    [COR LD NTC] [PRO SE]
                                    1460 Central Church Rd.
                                    Dover, DE 19904
                                    
                                    v.
                                    
                                    JOHN DOE, Unknown Officer, of
                                    the Delaware State Police
                                    aka
                                    Boy from Smyrna
                                    defendant
                                    
                                    
                                    



DOCKET     PROCEEDINGS



DATE     #                   DOCKET     ENTRY


8/4/99 1 ORDER, pltf shall either submit an app to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action w/in 10 days from date of this order. If pltf fails to timely remit filing fee or complete ifp, cmp will be dismissed. set Notice of Compliance deadline to 8/16/99 ( signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. ) copies to: pltf. (db) [Entry date 08/05/99]
8/4/99 2 COMPLAINT filed without ifp or filing fee. (db) [Entry date 08/05/99]
8/4/99 3 CASE assigned to Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. . Notice to all parties. (db) [Entry date 08/05/99]
8/10/99 4 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy) Re: The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of mandamus will be submitted to the next available panel of the Court (Writ was filed with 3rd CCA before case was opened). (sm)
8/10/99 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL by David Nollmeyer [1-1] order . Time: 3:55 PM Fee Status: NOT PAID (sm)
8/16/99 -- Certified and transmitted record on appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [5-1] appeal by David Nollmeyer; exit certified copies of docket entries indicating record complete for appeal purposes. (db)
8/16/99 -- copies to The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. and David Nollmeyer (db)
8/25/99 6 FINAL ORDER that based on the financial information submitted by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). ( signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. ) copies to: Plaintiff (sm)
8/25/99 -- Case closed (sm)
8/31/99 -- NOTICE of Docketing ROA from USCA Re: [5-1] appeal by David Nollmeyer USCA NUMBER: 99-5632 (sm) [Entry date 09/02/99]
9/3/99 -- Transmitted first supplemental record on appeal: [5-1] appeal by David Nollmeyer (db)
9/13/99 7 Return Acknowledgment of 1st supp. record by the U.S.C.A. 3rd. CIR. on 9/8/99. (sm) [Entry date 09/14/99]
9/14/99 8 Letter to David Nollmeyer dated 9/14/99 by deputy clerk RE: The Clerk's Office sent Mr. Nollmeyer docket sheets as requested in his letter. (sm) [Entry date 09/17/99]
9/21/99 -- Transmitted first supplemental record on appeal: [5-1] appeal by David Nollmeyer (db)
10/27/99 9 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy) Re: [5-1] appeal; The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This appeal will be submitted to a panel of the Court for determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court also will consider any other appropriate action, such as affirmance of the order of the District Court. (sm) [Entry date 11/01/99]
3/21/00 10 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy); This appeal is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (sm) [Entry date 03/23/00]



Case Flags:
CLOSED




END OF DOCKET: 1:99cv503